This is a discussion on Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act of 2004 within the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act forums, part of the Information and Knowledge Base category; It's likely that we'll just be able to hold onto what we've got in this regard after the November elections....
|
|||||||
| Register | Invite Friends | vbBux / vbPlaza | Stats | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
#21 |
|
Founder, Administrator
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act of 2004
It's likely that we'll just be able to hold onto what we've got in this regard after the November elections.
__________________
"Keep up the good fight, pass the word, and teach others to fight back when unjustly assaulted--be it on the street or in the courtroom. Self-defense is a normal, moral act. So teach your family, friends, and students practical defense against both physical and legal marauders." by Jerry VanCook |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#22 | ||||||||
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Tell-all-you-kan-a
|
Re: Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act of 2004
The GFSZA is law, but it's really nothing to be worried about. It was never intended as anything more than a sentence enhancer; given the previous SCOTUS ruling, and how the Court has changed since then (more in favor of gun rights), prosecution is even less likely.
I've not heard of a single prosecution since Lopez. There may have been one, but prosecutors are afraid of this one; they're only going to invoke it if a drug dealer was raping a baby at gunpoint in the principal's office.
__________________
Restore the Constitution!
http://www.ronpaul2008.com Want liberty in your lifetime? Join us! http://www.freestateproject.org |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | ||||||||
|
PO.org Supporter
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: 8°43′ N, 167°44′ E
|
Re: Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act of 2004
Ohio has pretty good laws when it comes to LEOSA. The Ohio AG opined that Law Enforcement Officers were exempt from laws regarding permit holders, as they are not required to have a permit.
__________________
I won't argue that it was a no-holds-barred adrenaline fuelled thrill-ride, but there's no way that you could perpetrate that amount of carnage and mayhem and not incur a considerable amount of paperwork. - Sergeant Nick Angel, Sandford Police Service Don't click here. Seriously! ![]() |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
PO.org Supporter
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act of 2004
That's one great thing about Ohio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | ||||||||
|
PO.org Supporter
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: 8°43′ N, 167°44′ E
|
Re: Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act of 2004
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
PO.org Supporter
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act of 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
PO.org Supporter
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act of 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Founder, Administrator
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act of 2004
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| law, enforcement, officers, safety, act, 2004 |
| Thread Tools | |